Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lexington Brewing Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 11, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Chiep Justice Hobson—

Affirming.

George Yaffe was conducting a soft drink establishment in Lebanon, Kentucky, where the local option law is in force. He ordered through a drummer of the Lexington Brewing Company a lot of malt mead. The order given the drummer was received by the Lexington Brewing Company at Lexington, and there approved. The goods were shipped from Lexington to Yaffe by rail. He began selling the goods, and some of the bottles were examined by a chemist on the application of the police authorities. It turned out that the contents of the bottles was lager…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Gast, Crofts & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Commonwealth v. BottomCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  3. Whitmire v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  4. Doores v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Parker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Commonwealth v. Hirsch Bros.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API