Wilson v. State

ON REHEARING,

October 13, 1920.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing, appellant urges that this Court was in error in holding that we could not consider certain bills of exception, upon which the trial court had noted in varying language, that no such objections were made, or no such bills of exception were taken, or that such proceedings were not shown in the record. It is again insisted that under the case of Rosa v. State, 86 Texas Crim. Rep., 646, 218 S. W. Rep., 1056, we should have considered said bills.

We have again reviewed said decision, and this matter, in view of the able and…