Legal Opinion

State v. Sholedice

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 2018No. CC 141765 (SC S064787 (Control) ), (CC 141766) (SC S064806)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

**148This case presents two questions. The first is whether a United States Postal Service (USPS) inspector seized a package in violation of the Oregon Constitution when she took the package out of a mail hamper and put it on the floor so that a drug-detection dog could sniff it. The second is whether another postal inspector seized the package when, after the dog had alerted to the package, he took it to the addressee's house and asked for consent to search it. Focusing on the first issue, the trial court ruled that no seizure had occurred because defendants had no constitutionally protected…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Illinois v. AndreasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. United States v. Van LeeuwenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PeekCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. State v. SholediceOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. LienOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. Bordeaux / BordeauxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API