Legal Opinion

Berry v. . Cedar Works

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 11, 1922Published

1Opinion of the Court

Civil action. The issues were answered as follows:

"1. Are plaintiffs owners and entitled to possession of the lands described in the complaint? Answer: `Yes.'
"2. Did defendant Richmond Cedar Works wrongfully and unlawfully trespass upon same? Answer: `Yes.'
"3. What damage, if any, has plaintiff sustained? Answer: `One cent.'"

Judgment for plaintiffs; appeal by defendant. The action was brought to recover damages for alleged trespass, but as the defendant admitted possession and the removal of timber, the controversy was practically confined to the first issue. The plaintiffs introduced a grant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Triplett v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Rowland v. . RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  3. Doe on Demise of Tate's Heirs v. SouthardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1824
  4. Hafner v. . IrwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1838
  5. Branch v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API