Aro Investment Company v. City of Omaha
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.
This is an action brought by the Aro Investment Company, a corporation, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against the city of Omaha, the mayor and the members of the city council, and the property owners abutting on the sides of what will hereinafter be designated as vacated Thirty-sixth Street. The action is to .restrain the enforcement of ordinance No. 22375 of the city of Omaha vacating and closing Thirty-sixth Street from Frances Street to a point 87 feet south of Frances Street in the city of Omaha, hereinafter designated as vacated Thirty-sixth Street, and for a declaration of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hanson v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
- Village of Maxwell v. BoothNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
- Hart v. Village of AinsworthNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
- Johnson v. BuhmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1915
- Village of Hay Springs v. Hay Springs Commercial Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by9 opinions
- Abboud v. Lakeview, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Stom v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- State, Department of Roads v. Merritt Bros. Sand & Gravel Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1966
- Tott v. Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- Western Fertilizer & Cordage Co. v. City of AllianceNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.