Legal Opinion

Quintana v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 29, 2005No. 3D04-1280Published

1Opinion

*630 On Rehearing

COPE, C.J.

By motion for rehearing the defendant argues that the sentencing law applicable to him is the habitual offender statute in effect on the date of sentencing, not on the date of his crime. That is incorrect. The applicable criminal penalties are those in effect at the date of the defendant’s crime. See Miller v. Florida, 482 U.S. 423, 107 S.Ct. 2446, 96 L.Ed.2d 351 (1987); Green v. State, 696 So.2d 488 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

Where, as here, the statute is amended between the crime date and the sentencing date, it is the statute in effect on the date of the crime which is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  3. Bover v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  4. Green v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API