Legal Opinion

Herbst v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided June 26, 1943No. Docket No. 109224UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cynthia Kuser Herbst v. Commissioner.

Herbst v. Commissioner

Docket No. 109224.

United States Tax Court

1943 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 230; 2 T.C.M. (CCH) 361; T.C.M. (RIA) 43309;

June 26, 1943

Aaron Holman, Esq., 25 Broadway, New York City, for the petitioner. Jonas M. Smith, Esq., for the respondent.

DISNEY

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

DISNEY, Judge: This proceeding involves the redetermination of deficiencies in income taxes for 1937 and 1938 in the respective amounts of $5,797.96 and $2,372.81. They were determined prior to the enactment on October 21, 1942, of section 121 of the Revenue Act…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Victoria Paper Mills Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1935
  2. Hopkinson v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1940
  3. Cadwalader v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  4. Connally v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1935
  5. Reese v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Whittemore v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API