Herbst v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
Cynthia Kuser Herbst v. Commissioner.
Herbst v. Commissioner
Docket No. 109224.
United States Tax Court
1943 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 230; 2 T.C.M. (CCH) 361; T.C.M. (RIA) 43309;
June 26, 1943
Aaron Holman, Esq., 25 Broadway, New York City, for the petitioner. Jonas M. Smith, Esq., for the respondent.
DISNEY
Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion
DISNEY, Judge: This proceeding involves the redetermination of deficiencies in income taxes for 1937 and 1938 in the respective amounts of $5,797.96 and $2,372.81. They were determined prior to the enactment on October 21, 1942, of section 121 of the Revenue Act…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Victoria Paper Mills Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1935
- Hopkinson v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1940
- Cadwalader v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
- Connally v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1935
- Reese v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
3Cited by1 opinion
- Whittemore v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1966