Marlin v. Williams
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLetts, Chief Judge
I concur with the majority that the trial judge should have recused himself, but I would not return the matter for a new trial. I am of the opinion that a directed verdict should have been entered because as a matter of law the broker was not entitled to a commission.
The total facts are amorphous and complex, but only a few need be recited to support my conclusion.
In essence, the seller advised the broker that the land was for sale and agreed to pay a commission if the broker procured a buyer. Thereafter the broker contacted a prospective purchaser who did not himself purchase, but instead…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- National Airlines, Inc. v. Oscar E. Dooly Associates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- First Realty Corp. v. Standard Steel Treating Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Leon Realty, Inc. v. HoughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Willner v. WilderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973