Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Marlin v. Williams

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 28, 1980No. Nos. 78-312, 78-313 and 78-323Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLetts, Chief Judge

I concur with the majority that the trial judge should have recused himself, but I would not return the matter for a new trial. I am of the opinion that a directed verdict should have been entered because as a matter of law the broker was not entitled to a commission.

The total facts are amorphous and complex, but only a few need be recited to support my conclusion.

In essence, the seller advised the broker that the land was for sale and agreed to pay a commission if the broker procured a buyer. Thereafter the broker contacted a prospective purchaser who did not himself purchase, but instead…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Airlines, Inc. v. Oscar E. Dooly Associates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  2. First Realty Corp. v. Standard Steel Treating Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  3. Leon Realty, Inc. v. HoughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  4. Willner v. WilderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API