Legal Opinion

Slear v. Hanna

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 5, 1996No. 2457PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

This is an action to determine the rights of the respondents, Michael W. Slear and Elizabeth A. Slear (Slears), to use Ester Landing in Watson’s Riverside Development as an access point to the Intercoastal Waterway. The referee held the developer, Watson’s Riverside, Inc., privately dedicated Ester Landing to all property owners in Watson’s Riverside Development, which included the Slears. The referee also held the developer gave a private easement to the landing to all property owners of the development and the Slears, as residents of Watson’s Riverside Development, have the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carolina Land Company, Inc. v. BlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  2. Frady v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  3. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Richburg v. BaughmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Graham v. State Farm Fire & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wade v. Berkeley CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Slear v. HannaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API