Legal Opinion

Gateley v. Humphrey

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 16, 1953No. 14464PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

See 247 S.W.2d 919 for majority opinion in above cause and dissent thereto. After overruling of motions for rehearing herein (first and second) we deemed it advisable to certify a question to our Supreme Court concerning construction of Article 2226, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. The Supreme Court on December 3, 1952, see 254 S.W.2d 98, having made answer to the question at issue in the negative, it follows that appellant Gateley should have and recover the further sum of $250 as attorney’s fees. The judgment of the trial court is therefore so reformed and enlarged as to include aforesaid item of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gateley v. HumphreyTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Gateley v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rio Grande Valley Sugar Growers, Inc. v. CampesiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Rio Grande Valley Sugar Growers, Inc. v. CampesiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API