Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Ficken

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 13, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The contested question for decision in this probate proceeding is the perennial one as to whether a holographic will on a printed form is properly executed in accordance with the mandates of section 21 of the Decedent Estate Law. The form here employed is of the familiar shape and size, consisting of two sheets joined together at the tops of what are customarily viewed as the first and third pages. For convenience of reference and description the portion of the blank containing the printed introductory wording will be called the first page; the reverse of this sheet the second; *408the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sisters of Charity of St. Vincent De Paul v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. In Re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. In Re the Probate of the Will of FieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. In Re Proving the Last Will & Testament of ConwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. In Re the Probate of the Alleged Will of WhitneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of CarneyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API