Legal Opinion

Wicker v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 23, 2004No. 25859PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice WALLER:

This is a direct appeal from an order of the circuit court which affirmed the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). The ALJ held that Respondent, Bennie Wicker, was entitled to be compensated the prevailing wage of $5.25 per hour for the time he was in training for his employment at the South Carolina Department of Corrections (DOC) Division of Prison Industries. We affirm.

FACTS

Wicker, while an inmate at Evans Correctional Institute, participated in the Prison Industries Program. During the first 320 hours of his employment, he was paid .25-.75 per hour; he was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. James Piatt v. Ellis MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Al-Shabazz v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Adkins v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Sullivan v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Slezak v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  2. Adkins v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Skipper v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  4. Williams v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  5. Torrence v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API