Legal Opinion

Howe v. City of Orange

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 17, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Garrison, who filed .the following opinion: “This is a bill filed by Annie H. B. Howe, charging that she is the owner of a house in the city of Orange; that the city of Orange owns and maintains a system of public water-supply for the benefit of the inhabitants; that on Saturday, May 6th, 1905, the complainant was notified by the clerk of the water department of the city of Orange that water would…

Read the full summary

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Garrison, who filed .the following opinion: “This is a bill filed by Annie H. B. Howe, charging that she is the owner of a house in the city of Orange; that the city of Orange owns and maintains a system of public water-supply for the benefit of the inhabitants; that on Saturday, May 6th, 1905, the complainant was notified by the clerk of the water department of the city of Orange that water would not be supplied to the premises until a bill of $201.39 for water previously supplied thereto had been paid; that…

1Per curiam

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Garrison in the court below.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Port, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Bogert, Vre-DENBURGH, VROOM, GREEN, GRAY, DlLL — 14.

For reversal — None.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Waldron v. International Water Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921
  2. Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. New BrunswickNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
  3. Munson Dye Works v. Jersey CityNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API