Legal Opinion

State v. Sargent

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 6, 1993No. C91-07-33376; CA A72824PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

This appeal involves the legality of the police practice of “securing the premises” pending issuance of a search warrant. The trial court held that the officers lawfully entered defendant’s apartment and that they permissibly observed evidence of drug activity while on the premises, but that their actions in “securing the premises” while a warrant was being obtained constituted an impermissible “seizure” of both the apartment and the items recovered during the warrant search. Or Const, Art I, § 9. Accordingly, the court denied defendant’s motion to suppress evidence of the items seen by the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Segura v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SargentOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. ReinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API