Legal Opinion

Miller v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 3, 1947No. 11366PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment on the pleadings in a cause of action based upon -a prior judgment entered in 1933, for the amount of a fine, a part of a criminal sentence on conviction of a federal offense in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.

Appellant does not question that such judgment for a fine is a cause of action for the recovery of a second judgment. Smith v. United States, 9 Cir., 143 F.2d 228, cer-tiorari denied 323 U.S. 729, 65 S.Ct. 65, 89 L.Ed. 585. His sole contention is that the denial of a prior petition in 1945…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Custer v. McCutcheonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Saunders v. SimmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  4. Bredfield v. HannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Juneau Spruce Corp. v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's UnionDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1955
  2. Donellan Jerome, Inc. v. Trylon Metals, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1967
  3. Juneau Spruce Corp. v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's UnionDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955
  4. United States v. JenkinsDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1956
  5. United States v. WelbornDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API