Miller v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment on the pleadings in a cause of action based upon -a prior judgment entered in 1933, for the amount of a fine, a part of a criminal sentence on conviction of a federal offense in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.
Appellant does not question that such judgment for a fine is a cause of action for the recovery of a second judgment. Smith v. United States, 9 Cir., 143 F.2d 228, cer-tiorari denied 323 U.S. 729, 65 S.Ct. 65, 89 L.Ed. 585. His sole contention is that the denial of a prior petition in 1945…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Custer v. McCutcheonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Saunders v. SimmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Bredfield v. HannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by7 opinions
- Juneau Spruce Corp. v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's UnionDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1955
- Donellan Jerome, Inc. v. Trylon Metals, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1967
- Juneau Spruce Corp. v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's UnionDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955
- United States v. JenkinsDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1956
- United States v. WelbornDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.