Legal Opinion

Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. v. Gould Coupler Co.

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided March 6, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Suit by the Safety Car Heating & Righting Company against the Gould Coupler Company. On motion for preliminary in-, junction.

1Opinion of the Court

RAY, District Judge.

Claims 1 to 8, inclusive, of the Creveling patent, No. 747,686, dated December 2, 1903, and issued on application filed February 12, 1902, are alleged to be infringed by the defendant. The patent relates to and embodies a “system of electrical regulation.” These claims have been the subject of litigation and adjudication in the federal courts in this, the Second circuit, by Judge Hazel (Safety Car Heating & Righting Co. v. U. S. Right & Ideating Co. [D. C. j 222 Fed. 310), and by the Circuit Court of Appeals (223 Fed. 1023, 138 C. C. A. 651), affirming Judge Hazel. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. v. United States Light & Heating Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1914
  2. Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. v. United States Lighting & Heating Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fulton Co. v. Powers Regulator Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API