Legal Opinion

State v. Helm

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 27, 1994No. 63169 and 65305PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Judge.

Defendant appeals after a jury convicted him of burglary in the second degree in violation of Sec. 569.170, RSMo.1986. Defendant was sentenced as a persistent offender to ten years’ imprisonment to run consecutively to another sentence for which he was already in prison. Also consolidated within this appeal, Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

Defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal. The facts viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict reveal that on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PurleeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. State v. HendersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. State v. GolaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  5. State v. KeenanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. PenningtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. State v. DudleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. State v. NelsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. State v. MahoneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. State of Missouri v. Cecil Russell McBengeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API