Graham v. Oregon State Penitentiary

Petitioner seeks judicial review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary, which found that he had violated Rule 13, by conspiring to violate Rule 4 (Assault).1 He asserts that there was insufficient evidence of a violation.2

In February, 1986, a confidential informant told a corrections officer that petitioner, along with two other inmates, had assaulted inmate Outright. Specifically, the informant stated that petitioner and another inmate held Outright while a third inmate inflicted a small cut on his neck with a razor blade. The hearings officer found the…