Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Hollensworth

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1882PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Oakland.' Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

Johnson sued- HoLensworth upon a covenant contained in a deed of conveyance, which he counted upon as a covenant against encumbrances. The only question which the record presents is, whether the plaintiff was correct in his construction of the covenant.

The deed bears date November 13, 1875. It purports to-convey a certain lot of land in Washington, D. C., “subject to the sum of sixteen hundred dollars, existing as an encumbrance on said lot, and secured by two deeds of trust; ” and it contains the following covenant: “ And the said parties of the first part [Hollensworth and wife] for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hoyt Post v. CampauMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Smith v. LloydMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Norton v. ColgroveMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Askew v. BrunerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Seldon v. Dudley E. Jones Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  3. Pease v. WarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Dodson v. CrockerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Neeley v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API