Legal Opinion

Dickinson v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided July 20, 1931No. Docket Nos. 35015, 43176Published

Petitioner, his wife and daughter were residents of Michigan, and conducted a business under the name of the American Metal Weatherstrip Company. The respondent determined that all of the income from this business belonged to petitioner. Upon the record, held, that one-third of the income of such business belonged to the wife and one-third to the daughter. L. F. Sunlin, 6. B.T.A. 1232, and other cases, followed.

1Opinion of the Court

ALBERT G. DICKINSON, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Dickinson v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 35015, 43176.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

23 B.T.A. 1212; 1931 BTA LEXIS 1751;

July 20, 1931, Promulgated

Petitioner, his wife and daughter were residents of Michigan, and conducted a business under the name of the American Metal Weatherstrip Company. The respondent determined that all of the income from this business belonged to petitioner. Upon the record, held, that one-third of the income of such business belonged to the wife and one-third to the daughter. L. F. Sunlin,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dickinson v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API