Legal Opinion

Yeung v. Advanced Biologics, LLC

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 20, 2019No. 3:17-cv-01510Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER A. YEUNG, et. al., Case No.: 17-cv-1510-JAH-JMA 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 13 v. MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 ADVANCED BIOLOGICS, LLC, et. al., [Doc. No. 32] 15 Defendants. 16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended 19 Complaint (“FAC”) pursuant to rules 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), and 23.1 of the Federal Rules of 20 Civil Procedure. See Doc. No. 36. Plaintiffs filed a response to Defendants’ motion…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Richard E. Loux v. B. J. Rhay, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API