Legal Opinion

Capital Garage Co. v. Gordon

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 7, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

A recognizance, which is defined to be an obligation of record entered into before a court or officer duly authorized for that purpose, is void when taken by one not lawfully authorized so to do. Commonwealth v. Loveridge, 11 Mass. 337; Harrington v. Brown, 7 Pick. (24 Mass.) 232; Reardon v. People, 123 Ill. App. 81; Cooper v. State, 23 Ark. 278; State v. Winninger, 81 Ind. 51; Stale v. Kruise, 32 N. J. Law, 313; Morrow v. State, 5 Kan. 563; Bennett, J., in Wilder v. Eldridge, 17 Vt. 223.

The one here sued on was entered into before a master in chancery, and was attached to the petition for a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rowley v. ShepardsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
  2. State v. WinningerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Commonwealth v. LoveridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  4. Roy v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
  5. Morrow v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Holden v. CampbellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
  2. In Re ZeraSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API