Legal Opinion

Fulop v. Malev Hungarian Airlines

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 27, 2003No. 00 Civ.1965(VM)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

MARRERO, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Joseph Fulop (“Fulop”) and his wife, Wanda Phillips (“Phillips,” and together with Fulop, “Plaintiffs”) instituted this action under the Warsaw Convention (the “Convention”) to recover damages for injuries Fulop allegedly sustained when he suffered a heart attack aboard an international flight operated by defendant Malev Hungarian Airlines (“Malev”). The Court granted Malev’s motion for summary judgment in part and denied it in part in a Decision and Order dated October 29, 2001 1 (the “Decision”), finding that (i) the unexpected event here…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nancy Kosakow v. New Rochelle Radiology Associates, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. GiganteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  3. Fulop v. Malev Hungarian AirlinesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mann v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2018
  2. Rodriguez v. Ansett Australia Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Rodriguez v. Ansett Australia Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Sensat v. Sw. Airlines Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  5. Coon v. BellDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API