Legal Opinion

Cais v. Pichler

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided March 2, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

David B. Saxe, J.

Plaintiff moves for summary judgment on the ground that there are no triable issues of fact or law with respect to defendant’s liability for an alleged unlawful seizure and sale at auction of plaintiff’s vehicle.

Defendant cross-moves pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7) to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action against him.

On a motion for summary judgment, the court is empowered pursuant to CPLR 3212 (subd [b]) to search the record *276and, if warranted, grant summary relief to the movant’s adversary, even though the latter did not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Deary v. Guardian Loan Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  2. Thorpe Electrical Supply, Inc. v. Deitz, New York County Courts1980
  3. Glass v. WienerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blum v. KochDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  2. People v. CobbAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API