Legal Opinion

Dudley v. Continental Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 3, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

“The object of the stipulation in a policy of insurance against a sale of the property insured is apparent. It is obviously based upon the idea that the risk and hazard of loss may be increased by a change of ownership.” Baldwin v. Insurance Co., 60 N. H. 422, 424. The provision prohibiting an assignment of the policy is based upon the same idea. Breeyear v. Insurance Co., 71 N. H. 445, 446.

By his deed and arrangement for, support the insured parted ydth all proprietary interest in the premises, changing his position from that of owner with power to manage and control the property, to that of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Conway National Bank v. PeaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1912
  2. Prescott v. JonesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1898
  3. Hall v. Fire Ass'n of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1887
  4. Breeyear v. Rockingam Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
  5. Baldwin v. Hartford Fire Ins.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1880

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Prince v. Granite State Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API