Maloy v. Duden
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.1
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents the' question-whether the court below erred in deciding that upon the facts the plea of res adjudícala was a good defense to the suit. 77 Fed. 935.
The complainant, Maloy, was from 1878 to 1886 a partner with the defendant, Duden, in the mercantile firm, doing business at New York City by the style of Duden & Co. By the partnership articles, Maloy was to have 25 per cent, of the proceeds, and Duden was to have 75 per cent. Neither partner contributed any capital, but Duden was a member of the firm of Duden & Co., of Brussels, and during the existence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Lovejoy v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- David Bradley Manuf'g Co. v. Eagle Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1893
- Eagle Manuf'g Co. v. MillerU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1890
- Miller v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1881
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. CandelariaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. DollarDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1951
- United States v. CandelariaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926