Legal Opinion

Ross v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 3, 1959No. 93-57PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff sues for refund of income taxes paid on an amount which the taxing authorities treated as a dividend, and which he claims should have been-treated as long-term capital gain.

In 1954 plaintiff owned 450 shares of capital stock in the Washington Loan and Trust Company of Washington, D. C., hereinafter referred to as the “Trust Company”, a banking corporation organized under the laws of the District of Columbia. The Riggs National Bank of Washington, D. C., hereinafter referred to as the “Riggs Bank”, is a national banking association organized under the banking laws…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Estate of BedfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Kirschenbaum v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. SniteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  4. Northup v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  5. United States v. Seattle-First National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. King Enterprises, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  2. Wilson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966
  3. Edmondson v. Allen-Russell Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. William F. And Gwendolyn Wright v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  5. Clark v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API