Legal Opinion
Charles v. Pierce
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided April 27, 1964No. 5-3236PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Carleton Harris, Chief Justice.
T. 0. Cullum died intestate in Van Burén County in 1928, leaving a widow, Laura, and no lineal descendants. Accordingly, the widow was endowed of an undivided one-half interest in the real estate owned by her husband, and the brothers and sisters (or descendants) of Cullum inherited the other half. Cullum and his wife had deeded ten acres of land in 1915 to Anna Johnson. Cullum was the owner of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, with the exception of the ten acres, and of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 32,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fordyce v. VickersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Darr v. LambertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- Herget v. McLeodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Price v. PriceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Junction City Special School District No. 75 v. WhiddonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Norman v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Appollos v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
- Greif Bros. Cooperage Corp. v. United States Gypsum Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Weast v. Hereinafter Described LandsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
- Greif Bros. Cooperage Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. United States Gypsum Company, an Illinois Corporation, United States Gypsum Company, an Illinois Corporation v. Greif Bros. Cooperage Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.