Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chaffee v. Clark Equipment Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 16, 1985No. 3-1283A401Published

1DissentStaton, Presiding Judge

Mere accident instructions are a plague upon the administration of justice when they are used to reach the issue of liability. The Majority disapproves of their use but refused to reverse. I would reverse. My dissent is for the following reasons:(1) The Majority attempts to overrule the Supreme Court opinion in Miller v. Alvey (1965), 246 Ind. 560, 207 N.E.2d 633 and the Court of Appeals, Second District, opinion in Dunlap v. Goldwin (1981), Ind.App., 425 N.E.2d 724.(2) The Majority's reliance upon Condor v. Hull Lift Truck, Inc., (1982), Ind., 435 N.E.2d 10, is misplaced. The Majority should…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miller v. AlveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Perry v. GossIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Conder v. Hull Lift Truck, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Adkins v. ElvardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Jessop v. Werner Transportation Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API