Legal Opinion

Moorman v. Interstate Life & Accident Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

On April 13, 1936, the defendant issued an industrial insurance policy to Charlie H. Moorman in the sum of $312, with a provision for the payment of double indemnity in case of accidental death. The insured was acci-dently killed by electrocution on June 11, 1936.

On June 24, 1936, defendant paid to the plaintiff beneficiary the sum of $317, taking her release, and at the same time denied its liability for the double indemnity.

The suit to recover on the double indemnity provision of the policy was begun in October, 1937.

The defendant invokes the following* provision of the policy as a bar to a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. v. HooperTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Interstate Life & Accident Co. v. HuntTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Johnson v. Life & Casualty Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Home Beneficial Ass'n v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  2. United States v. Republic Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API