Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Pealer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Mandamus. Application to compel circuit judge to vacate order dismissing an appeal in proceedings had before him to dissolve an attachment. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

Eelator asks for a mandamus to compel the circuit judge of St. Joseph county to vacate an order dismissing an appeal in proceedings to dissolve an attachment.

By an act of the Legislature passed in 1851 provision was made that a defendant whose property had been attached might apply to a circuit judge or to a circuit court commissioner for a dissolution. This act did not provide for an appeal from the decision of those officers, nor for a trial by jury.

- The act so remained until 1881, when a new section was-' added, which reads as follows:

“ Either party conceiving himself aggrieved by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Calvert Lithographing, Engraving, & Map Publishing Co. v. Drs. K. & K. U. S. Medical & Surgical Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sparta Foundry Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Valentine v. MaloneMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Board of Com'rs v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Thie v. CordellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  5. Ex parte FranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API