Legal Opinion

Nachod v. Nachod

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 1960No. Appeal, 332PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from an order certifying the suit in equity to the law side of the court. In taking the appeal, the plaintiff relied for authorization upon Section 2 of the Act of June 7, 1907, P. L. 440, 12 PS §1228. But that section of the Act of 1907 has been suspended by Buie 1550(10) of the Pennsylvania Buies of Civil Procedure: Korona v. Bensalem Township, 385 Pa. 283, 284, 122 A. 2d 688. The appeal is, therefore, premature as having been taken from an interlocutory order which has not been made appealable by statute: see Section 4 of the Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Korona v. Bensalem TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. T. C. R. Realty, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. West Homestead Borough School District v. Allegheny County Board of School DirectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. McFarland v. Weiland Packing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Samuels v. HendricksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Ridge Radio Corp. v. GlosserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API