Pomerance v. Gragg
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
This is an appeal by the plaintiffs Joseph and Mildred Pomerance from a final order dismissing their amended complaint sounding in legal malpractice, as further amended by plaintiffs’ more definite statement. The plaintiffs assert a series of acts of alleged legal malpractice in connection with the defendant K. Lawrence Gragg’s representation of them concerning an option to purchase clause of a lease contract. Without undertaking a detailed analysis of the asserted acts of legal malpractice herein, suffice it to say that some of these allegations fail to state a cause of action for legal…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rishel v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Peacock v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Howard v. Minnesota Muskies, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Zeccola v. EzzoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979