Legal Opinion

Pomerance v. Gragg

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 29, 1987No. 87-1134Published

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs Joseph and Mildred Pomerance from a final order dismissing their amended complaint sounding in legal malpractice, as further amended by plaintiffs’ more definite statement. The plaintiffs assert a series of acts of alleged legal malpractice in connection with the defendant K. Lawrence Gragg’s representation of them concerning an option to purchase clause of a lease contract. Without undertaking a detailed analysis of the asserted acts of legal malpractice herein, suffice it to say that some of these allegations fail to state a cause of action for legal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Rishel v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Peacock v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Howard v. Minnesota Muskies, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Zeccola v. EzzoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API