Hooper v. State

Johnson, Presiding Judge.

This is an in rem forfeiture case under OCGA § 16-13-49. It is the second appearance of the case before us. In the initial appeal, we reversed the trial court’s forfeiture of property containing a tavern, but affirmed the forfeiture of property upon which a mobile home was located.1 Specifically, we held as follows: “The specific property to be forfeited shall include only that portion of the defendant real *778property on which the mobile home sits and the mobile home itself.”2

On remand, the trial court made our opinion the order of the trial court. In the same order,…