Legal Opinion

In re Little

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1902PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Habeas corpus by Philip Little against the sheriff of Montcalm. county.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

The petitioner is confined in the jail of Montcalm county under a complaint and warrant charging him with the crime of burglary committed in that county. He seeks release upon the writ of habeas corpus, for the reason that, at the time of his arrest for this crime, he was confined in the jail of Kent county, Mich., under a warrant issued from the United States court for the Northern district of Ohio, charging him with the crime of robbery of post-offices in Michigan, and under the order of the United States court in Ohio removing him to the United States court for the Western district of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lascelles v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. In re CannonMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. People ex rel. Watson v. Judge of Superior CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. In re MahonDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1888

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Jackson v. OlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. People v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  5. In re FlackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API