Legal Opinion

King v. Crone

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 6, 1914Published

Appeal from Cleburne Chancery Court; George T. Humphries, Chancellor; J. M. Crone brought this suit to have a deed from Hammock to King declared a mortgage, alleging that he had purchased the land, 138 acres, from Hammock and borrowed .money from King with which to pay for it; that Hammock executed the deed to King, which was intended only to secure the repayment of the money to him, and that on the same day King executed to plaintiff a bond for title for the east portion of…

Read the full summary

Appeal from Cleburne Chancery Court; George T. Humphries, Chancellor; J. M. Crone brought this suit to have a deed from Hammock to King declared a mortgage, alleging that he had purchased the land, 138 acres, from Hammock and borrowed .money from King with which to pay for it; that Hammock executed the deed to King, which was intended only to secure the repayment of the money to him, and that on the same day King executed to plaintiff a bond for title for the east portion of the land containing seventy acres, and also executed to one Arthur Harkey a bond for title for the west portion,…

1Opinion of the Court

1. Deed — deed as mortgage — previous transactions. — Where the evidence shows that K. sold certain land to C., giving a bond for title for the same and taking purchase money notes from C., the transaction will be held to be a sale, irrespective of previous transactions between the parties, whereby K. acquired title from one H. by a method which C. declares constituted a mortgage between himself and K.

3. Appeal and error — findings of chancellor — reversal.—Where the findings of the chancellor are against the decided weight of the testimony, the decree will be reversed.

reversed.

STATEMENT BY…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hays v. EmersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  2. Hinkle v. BroadwaterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  3. Rushton v. McIllveneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  4. Whitehead v. HendersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  5. Doniphan, Kensett & Searcy Railroad v. Missouri & North Arkansas RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API