Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Eiselein v. Montana Bank of Roundup

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1991No. 90-599Published

1Concurrence

JUSTICE TRIEWEILER,

specially concurring:

I agree that the District Court was correct when it denied plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment. I also concur with the majority that the District Court’s order granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment should be affirmed. However, I disagree with the reasons set forth by the majority for their decision.

This is clearly not a case where the undisputed facts bar plaintiff’s claim pursuant to the doctrine of merger.

It is correct that evidence of prior oral agreements is not admissible to alter a subsequent written agreement so long as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reaves v. ReinboldMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Keil v. Glacier Park, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Mally v. AsanovichMontana Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Heckman and Shell v. WilsonMontana Supreme Court · 1971
  5. First Nat. Mont. Bank of Missoula v. McGuinessMontana Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API