Eiselein v. Montana Bank of Roundup
Montana Supreme Court
1Concurrence
JUSTICE TRIEWEILER,
specially concurring:
I agree that the District Court was correct when it denied plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment. I also concur with the majority that the District Court’s order granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment should be affirmed. However, I disagree with the reasons set forth by the majority for their decision.
This is clearly not a case where the undisputed facts bar plaintiff’s claim pursuant to the doctrine of merger.
It is correct that evidence of prior oral agreements is not admissible to alter a subsequent written agreement so long as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Reaves v. ReinboldMontana Supreme Court · 1980
- Keil v. Glacier Park, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1980
- Mally v. AsanovichMontana Supreme Court · 1967
- Heckman and Shell v. WilsonMontana Supreme Court · 1971
- First Nat. Mont. Bank of Missoula v. McGuinessMontana Supreme Court · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.