Legal Opinion

Furman v. North

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1874PublishedCited by 1 opinion

FROM SMITH. Appeal from the Chancery Court. J. O. Shackle-ford, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtFreeman, J.

This bill alleges that E. M. North and Jarrott Tucker are indebted to complainants by certain promissory notes executed in January, 1861. That North and Tucker made a deed of trust to secure these *297notes, conveying various articles of personal property and a tract of land, which appears to have been owned by North, at any rate he had the equitable title. This deed was made to one White. The prayer of the bill is for an account of such payments as had been made, and for the execution of the trust by a sale (of the land, with application of proceeds to the payment of the debts secured. This bill…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Joy v. OutlawCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API