Legal Opinion

United States v. Waite

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 30, 1929No. 8425-8427PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, District Judge.

The three foregoing entitled eases were argued and submitted together. They inVolve.identi.cal questions. Nos. 8425 and 8426, grow out of an estate tax assessed and paid on the estate of Alfred H.' Rogers, deceased, under the Revmué Act of 1918 (40 Stat. 1057). The reason for two eases is tha$ certain payments of the tax assessed were paid to George F. Crutchley, collector of internal revenue for the Western district of Missouri, who before subsequent payments were made died. Recovery for excess of such payments is attempted in case No. 8425, brought in the court below…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Reinecke v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. New York Trust Co. v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Nichols v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Chase National Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Estate of Bernays v. MajorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. State v. HoggTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
  3. Schuette v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  4. Estate of Poe v. PoeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  5. Crooks v. LooseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API