Legal Opinion

Graham Architectural Products Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1992No. 465 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

Before us is an appeal by Graham Architectural Products (Employer), from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) reversing a referee’s decision and reinstating Deborah Lou Rothrock’s (Claimant) benefits under The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act1 (Act). For the reasons set forth below, we vacate the order of the Board and remand- for additional findings.

The relevant facts are as follows. Claimant was employed as a window packer by Employer. On June 16, 1988, Claimant sustained a work-related injury to her lower back and received compensation benefits.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Lord v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Sule v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Olivetti Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. County of Dauphin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moltzen v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Keen Transport, Inc., and Sparta Ins. Co. v. WCAB (Shields)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. M. Palmer v. WCAB (Tasty Baking Company)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API