Covino v. Spirit Airlines, Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 ROBYN COVINO, Case No. 2:20-cv-01039-GMN-NJK 8 Plaintiff(s), Order 9 v. [Docket No. 43] 10 SPIRIT AIRLINES, INC., 11 Defendant(s). 12 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to compel discovery. Docket No. 43. 13 Plaintiff filed a response in opposition. Docket No. 46.1 Defendant filed a reply. Docket No. 48. 14 The motion is properly resolved without a hearing. See Local Rule 78-1. For the reasons discussed 15 below, the motion to compel is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 16 I. BACKGROUND 17 Plaintiff brings claims…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- In Re Convergent Technologies Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1985
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. ButcherDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1986
- Marlyn Sali v. Corona Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.