Legal Opinion

State v. Rognrud

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 30, 1990No. 89-1944-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaROCQUE, J.

Richard Rognrud appeals a judgment of conviction for third-degree sexual assault in violation of sec. 940.225(3), Stats. He challenges the trial court's ruling that barred him from presenting extrinsic evidence of three prior allegedly false accusations of sexual assault made by the complaining witness, T.C. We affirm.

Although the court permitted defense counsel to cross-examine T.C. about three other alleged false reports of sexual assault, two involving T.C. and one involving her young son, the court refused to allow other witnesses to testify whether T.C.'s prior statements were false.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. AllesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. McClelland v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Weiss v. Regent Properties, Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Lewandowski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. RingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. Richard Knutson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  3. State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  4. State v. ReaglesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  5. Vogel v. Grant-Lafayette Electric CooperativeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API