Morgan v. Murtha
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
•Appeal "by the-.defendant from a judgment of the City Court of Rew York, at. General Term, which affirmed a. judgment for the.plaintiffs, rendered, upon a verdict in- their favor- at Trial Term. Action. to recover, the plaintiffs’ charges as warehousemen*. • claimed under a contract, for the. storage of the- defendant’s furniture.
1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.
The plaintiffs are warehousemen and have. brought this action to recover for items of cartage and storage of goods delivered to them by the defendant in March, 1883, under an agreement for their storage at a stated price per month, and’ for, an indefinite period.
The subject of the contract originally comprised a large amount of furniture, the greater portion of which was returned to the defendant, upon her demand about six months after the storage . commenced, and upon her payment of charges amounting to $493.36; but a dispute arose at the time as to whether this payment covered all charges…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hamilton v. . McPhersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Dale v. BrinckerhoffNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1877
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hernandez v. European Auto Collision, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1972
- Erie Railroad v. F. Kieser & Son Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Erie Railroad v. F. Kieser & Son, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1925