Legal Opinion
State Division of Human Rights v. Koch
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 10, 2009PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to enforce a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights dated October 24, 2006, which, after a hearing (1) found that the complainant, Carla S. Freitag-Hogan, was (a) subjected to a hostile work environment because of her sex, (b) subjected to disparate treatment because of her sex, and (c) constructively discharged from her employment because of her sex, (2) found that the respondent Paul Koch was individually liable for the sexual harassment, and (3) awarded the complainant (a) the sum of $36,000, plus interest…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Patrowich v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- New York City Transit Authority v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- City of New York v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- State Division of Human Rights v. BystrickyNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- New York State Division of Human Rights v. Adams Security, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by13 opinions
- Eastport Associates, Inc. v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Suffolk Laundry Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- MTA Trading, Inc. v. KirklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- New York State Division of Human Rights v. Young Legends, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Matter of New York State Div. of Human Rights v. Team Taco Mexico, Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.