Legal Opinion

Polk-Highlands Counties Land Co. v. Isaacs

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 30, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTerrell, C. J.

In November 1925, the assignors of plaintiff in error entered into a contract with defendants in error for the sale of approximately thirty-one hundred (3,100) shares of the capital stock of Daytona Shores, Incorporated. This contract was subsequently assigned to plaintiff in error. In February, 1927, plaintiff in error filed its amended declaration in an action at law to recover the unpaid balance alleged to have been due on said contract. A demurrer to the said amended declaration was sustained, final judgment was entered and writ of error was taken thereto.

The primary question raised by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arkansas Valley Land & Cattle Co. v. MannSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Hatch v. Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Wade v. MoffettIllinois Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Searl v. CozadOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Penner v. Y.M.C.A., Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API