Legal Opinion

Jordan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 4, 1949No. 24363Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

In his motion for rehearing, appellant complains because in our original opinion we did not discuss a bill of exception complaining that hearsay evidence was admitted over his objection as to what the arresting officer said to Willie Haynes. We have examined the bill and find no error reflected thereby.

Appellant also complains that we erred in not reversing the judgment because the state’s main witness, Willie Haynes, in *469an affidavit attached to the motion for a new trial retracted his testimony against appellant. He cites many authorities…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Trigg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Adell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API