Clay v. Sloan
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM CARROLL. Appeal from Chancery Court of Carroll County. A. G'. IÍAWKINS, Oh.
1Opinion of the CourtWiLKEs, J.
The bill in this ease is of a somewhat mixed character. In some respects it is *402an ejectment bill to recover a small strip of land lying between two adjoining owners. In otter features it is an action of forcible entry and unlawful detainer, and in still another aspect of the case it is a bill to establish boundary lines and to fix them between the adjoining proprietors. The Chancellor refused any relief, and dismissed the bill, and complainant has appealed and assigned errors.
We are of opinion the bill cannot be sustained as an ejectment bill, because the title of complainant is not deraigned…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Link v. SchlegelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Harris v. BuchignaniTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
- Demarcus v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
- Scales v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
- Robinson v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.