Legal Opinion

State v. Brazle

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 8, 1983No. [No. 76, September Term, 1982.]PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.

The issue presented in this case is whether a guilty plea is voluntarily and intelligently entered when the trial judge in accepting same does not specifically advise the defendant that the court is not bound to follow a presentence recommendation of probation.

Mamie Brazle was indicted for obtaining public assistance by fraud and other offenses in Anne Arundel County. She pleaded guilty to welfare fraud in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County in exchange for the State’s agreeing to make no recommendation as to sentencing. The State further agreed to dismiss the other counts in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Commonwealth v. MorrowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. State v. ColyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. United States v. Michael JournetCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  5. State v. PrietCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. DaughtryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  2. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Barnes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. Durbin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  5. Custer v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API