Legal Opinion

In Re Pelkey

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 25, 2010No. 19-50301Published

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO PLAN CONFIRMATION

ALBERT S. DABROWSKI, Chief Judge.

I.INTRODUCTION

Before the Court are the First Amended Chapter 13 Plan (hereafter, the “Plan”), Doc. I.D. No. 37, filed by Randy Richard Pelkey and Luz Hermida Pelkey (hereafter, the “Debtors”); and the Objection to Confirmation (hereafter, the “Objection”), Doc. I.D. No. 56, filed by the Chapter 13 Standing Trustee, Molly T. Whiton (hereafter, the “Trustee”).

The parties have filed a Stipulation, Doc. I.D. No. 57, as to all of the relevant facts. The sole question before the Court is whether the above-median…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Ross-Tousey v. NearyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Hamilton v. Lanning (In Re Lanning)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API