Hauptman, O'Brien, Wolf & Lathrop, P.C. v. Milwaukee Guardian
Nebraska Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Sievers, Judge.
This case involves the question of whether Milwaukee Guardian, a division of Milwaukee Insurance Company (Milwaukee), must pay one-third of its $2,000 medical payment subrogation interest to the law firm of Hauptman, O’Brien, Wolf & Lathrop, P.C. (Hauptman, O’Brien). The answer largely depends upon whether the common fund doctrine applies in this case. The district court found that the common fund doctrine was applicable and ordered Milwaukee to pay $666.66 to Hauptman, O’Brien. Milwaukee appeals to this court.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The case was tried to the district court upon the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United Services Automobile Association v. HillsNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
- In Re Guardianship of BloomquistNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Shelter Insurance Companies v. FrohlichNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Krause v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
- Koehler v. Farmers Alliance Mutual InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Estate of StullNebraska Court of Appeals · 1999
- In Re Estate of StullNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Hauptman, O'Brien v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2021
- McGrath v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- Nelsen v. GrzywaNebraska Court of Appeals · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.