Legal Opinion

Hauptman, O'Brien, Wolf & Lathrop, P.C. v. Milwaukee Guardian

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 1998No. A-97-428PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sievers, Judge.

This case involves the question of whether Milwaukee Guardian, a division of Milwaukee Insurance Company (Milwaukee), must pay one-third of its $2,000 medical payment subrogation interest to the law firm of Hauptman, O’Brien, Wolf & Lathrop, P.C. (Hauptman, O’Brien). The answer largely depends upon whether the common fund doctrine applies in this case. The district court found that the common fund doctrine was applicable and ordered Milwaukee to pay $666.66 to Hauptman, O’Brien. Milwaukee appeals to this court.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The case was tried to the district court upon the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United Services Automobile Association v. HillsNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. In Re Guardianship of BloomquistNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Shelter Insurance Companies v. FrohlichNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Krause v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Koehler v. Farmers Alliance Mutual InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of StullNebraska Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. In Re Estate of StullNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Hauptman, O'Brien v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. McGrath v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Nelsen v. GrzywaNebraska Court of Appeals · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API